Previous Page  40 / 59 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 40 / 59 Next Page
Page Background

Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 2016-015

ACT VS16-06

40

Moored Deployment off Coconut Island in Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii

An 18 week long moored field test was conducted in Kaneohe Bay from September 22,

2015 to January 20, 2016. The deployment site was located at 21.43° N x 157.79° W, on the

fringing reef flat surrounding Coconut Island (HIMB) in a depth of 3 meters (Photo 5). Kaneohe

Bay, located on the eastern side of Oahu, Hawaii, is a complex estuarine system with a large

barrier coral reef, numerous patch reefs, fringing reefs, and several riverine inputs. Tides in

Kaneohe Bay are semi-diurnal with mean tidal amplitude of approximately 68 cm day.

Photo 5.

Aerial view of HIMB deployment site (left) and instrument rack in-situ (right).

Time series results of ambient conditions for tidal height, temperature, and salinity are

given in figure 7. Temperature at the sensor level ranged from 23.1 to 29.1 °C and salinity from

27.3 to 34.7 over the duration of the field test. The bottom panel displays the maximum difference

recorded between all reference thermistors mounted at the same depth but located across the

mooring rack. The average temperature difference observed across the space of the mooring rack

was 0.15 ±0.17

o

C, with a maximum of 1.23

o

C. Differences between instrument and reference

readings resulting from this variability should be minimized as the sampling bottle integrates

across the mooring space.

The EXO2 reported data throughout the entire deployment and generated 5653

observations based on its 30 minute sampling interval for a data completion result of 100%. Time

series results of the EXO2 and corresponding reference DO results are given in figure 8. Ambient

DO measured by the EXO2 ranged from 1.97 to 10.50 mg/L compared to the range captured by the

reference measurements of 3.63 to 9.85 mg/L. The average and standard deviation of the

differences between instrument and reference readings (n=129) were -0.097 ± 0.228 mg/L, with a

total range in the differences of -1.391 to 1.083 mg/L. There was no significant drift in instrument

offset (slope = 0.00017 mg/L/d; r

2

= 0.0008) throughout the deployment period. This rate would

include any biofouling effects as well as any electronic or calibration drift.