Previous Page  46 / 59 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 46 / 59 Next Page
Page Background

Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 2016-015

ACT VS16-06

46

Great Lakes Profiling

Great Lakes profiling tests were performed aboard the R/V Laurentian at two separate

locations in order to experience both normoxic and hypoxic hypolimnion (Photo 7). The normoxic

site was located in Lake Michigan (43.184

°

N, 86.456

°

W) within a 64m deep water column, while

the hypoxic site was in Muskegon Lake at 43.22

°

N, 86.30

°

W with a 24m deep water column.

Photo 7.

Aerial view of Lake Michigan and Muskegon Lake (left) and profile rig used for GL profiling

Two profiling trials were conducted at each location. The first trial involved equilibrating

test instruments at the surface (3m) for ten minutes and then collecting three Niskin bottle samples

at one minute intervals. Following the third sample, the rosette was quickly profiled into the

hypolimnion where samples were collected immediately upon arrival and then each minute for the

next 6 minutes (figure 11 and 13). The second trial was performed in the reverse direction where

instruments were equilibrated at depth, three samples collected, and then profiled into the surface

and sampled over the next 7 minutes. Note for Muskegon Lake cast 1 was discarded due to bottle

misfires, so a third cast was performed to repeat the original trial 1 pattern (Fig. 11).

Temperature and DO concentration profiles for Muskegon Lake and Lake Michigan are

given in figures 12 and 14, respectively. In Muskegon Lake, the temperature ranged from 21.0

o

C

at the surface to 13.5

o

C in the hypolimnion, with corresponding DO concentrations of 7.8 and 2.8

mg/L, respectively. In Lake Michigan, the temperature ranged from 21.0

o

C at the surface to 4.1

o

C in the hypolimnion, with corresponding DO concentrations of 8.6 and 12.6 mg/L, respectively.

Results for the EXO2 for the two Muskegon Lake trials are shown in figure 15. The

instrument exhibited a negative bias in the colder, low DO hypolimnion and a positive bias in the

warm, high DO surface. Sensor equilibration time was slightly greater going from surface to

hypolimnetic conditions (

right side, cast 3

). The range in measurement differences between

instrument and reference was -0.13 to 0.18 mg/L for cast 2 and -0.28 to 0.23 mg/L for cast 3.