Previous Page  35 / 59 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 59 Next Page
Page Background

Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 2016-015

ACT VS16-06

35

Moored Deployment at Chesapeake Biological Laboratory (CBL)

An eleven week moored field test was conducted in Chesapeake Bay from May 20 to

August 5, 2015. The deployment was located at 38.32°N, 76.45°W attached to the side of a pier at

the mouth of the Patuxent River (Photo 3.) The site was brackish with an average water depth of

the test site was 2.2 m.

Photo 3.

Aerial view of CBL deployment site (left) and duplicate sampling at mooring rack.

Time series results of ambient conditions for tidal height, temperature, and salinity are

given in figure 4. Temperature ranged from 19.2 to 30.1 and salinity from 4.7 to 13.7 over the

duration of the field test. The bottom panel displays the maximum difference recorded between all

reference thermistors (RBR Solo and SBE26) mounted at the same depth and different locations

across the mooring rack. The average temperature difference observed across the space of the

mooring rack was 0.21 ±0.25

o

C, with a maximum of 3.26

o

C. Differences between instrument and

reference readings resulting from this variability should be minimized as the sampling bottle

integrates across the mooring space.

The EXO2 sonde had two brief periods of interruption on July 8th and July 12th, and then

quit operating permanently on July 31

st

, approximately 4 days before the end of the 11 week

deployment which covered from May 20 through August 4. The EXO2 generated 6027 from a

possible 7270 observations based on its 30 minute sampling interval, for a data completion result

of 83%. Time series results of the EXO2 and corresponding reference DO results are given in the

top panel of figure 5. Ambient DO measured by the EXO2 ranged from 3.11 to 14.85 mg/L

compared to the range captured by the reference measurements of 4.370 to 10.858 mg/L. The

bottom panel presents the time series of the difference between the EXO2 and reference DO for

each matched pair (limited to ± 2.0 mg/L; n=119 comparisons out of a total of 142, (21 missing

data points and 2 comparisons ≥ 2.0 mg/L). The average and standard deviation of the

measurement difference for the deployment was 0.151 ±0.220 mg/L, with the total range of

differences between -0.689 to 0.786 mg/L. There was no significant trend in the drift rate of

instrument offset (slope = 0.0007 mg/L/d; r

2

=0.002) over the deployment period. This rate would

include any biofouling effects as well as any electronic or calibration drift.