Previous Page  39 / 73 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 39 / 73 Next Page
Page Background

Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 2016-010

ACT VS16-01

39

Table 6.

Summary of regression statistics for the AroW-USB versus reference sample response curves for each

of the nine laboratory trials.

Test ID

R2

y Intercept

Slope

LT15S00*

0.996

-0.188

1.001

LT15S10

0.999

-0.226

1.021

LT15S35

0.995

-0.510

1.066

LT04S00

1.000

-0.280

1.021

LT04S10*

0.980

0.154

0.916

LT04S35

0.997

-0.274

1.050

LT30S00

0.997

-0.274

1.050

LT30S10

0.997

-0.313

1.093

LT30S35

1.000

-0.134

1.053

* Bubble contamination data excluded.

Results of the 56 day long-term stability and thermal stress challenge for the AroW-USB are

shown in figure W. The instrument was maintained in a well circulated tank and oxygen content

manipulated by alternately varying water temperature set point between 15 and 25

o

C several times per

week of deployment. The data completion result for the stability test was 100%. The time series of

instrument readings at 15min intervals is plotted against discrete values for Winkler reference samples

(

top panel

) along with the time series of the difference between instrument and reference

measurements (

bottom panel

). The overall mean difference between measurements was -0.154 (s.d. =

0.319) mg/L. There was a minor drift in instrument accuracy over the deployment (slope = -0.006

mg/L/d; r

2

=0.17) but the goodness of fit was low due to several outliers.

Results for the functional sensor response time assessment of the AroW-USB are shown in

figure X. The top panel depicts the time series of 10s instrument reads during transfers between

adjacent high (9.6 mg/L) and low (2.0 mg/L) DO water baths, maintained commonly at 15

o

C. The

bottom panel (

lower left

) depicts results fit with a 3 parameter exponential decay function: DO

rel

=

DO

relMin

+ a

e

-bt

and indicated τ calculated from fit. Data for low DO to high DO transitions (

lower

right

) were treated similarly but normalized to steady state value in subsequent high DO tank and

subsequently fit with an analogous 3 parameter exponential rise function: DO

rel

= DO

relMin

+ a(1-

e

-bt

)

with indicated τ being directly calculated from fit. The calculated τ

90

was 209 s during high to low

transitions and 284 s for low to high transitions covering a DO range of approximately 8 mg/L at a

constant 15

o

C.