Previous Page  40 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 40 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 2016-016

ACT VS16-07

40

Moored Deployment off Coconut Island in Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii

An 18 week long moored field test was conducted in Kaneohe Bay from September 22,

2015 to January 20, 2016. The deployment site was located at 21.43° N x 157.79° W, on the

fringing reef flat surrounding Coconut Island (HIMB) in a depth of 3 meters (Photo 5). Kaneohe

Bay, located on the eastern side of Oahu, Hawaii, is a complex estuarine system with a large

barrier coral reef, numerous patch reefs, fringing reefs, and several riverine inputs. Tides in

Kaneohe Bay are semi-diurnal with mean tidal amplitude of approximately 68 cm day.

Photo 5.

Aerial view of HIMB deployment site (left) and instrument rack in-situ (right).

Time series results of ambient conditions for tidal height, temperature, and salinity are

given in figure 7. Temperature at the sensor level ranged from 23.1 to 29.1 °C and salinity from

27.3 to 34.7 over the duration of the field test. The bottom panel displays the maximum difference

recorded between all reference thermistors mounted at the same depth but located across the

mooring rack. The average temperature difference observed across the space of the mooring rack

was 0.15 ±0.17

o

C, with a maximum of 1.23

o

C. Differences between instrument and reference

readings resulting from this variability should be minimized as the sampling bottle integrates

across the mooring space.

The Troll quit operating on Oct 18

th

and generated 579 out of 2826 possible

observations based on its hourly sampling interval for a data completion result of 21%. Time

series results of the Troll 9000 and corresponding reference DO results are given in figure 8.

Ambient DO measured by the Troll 9000 ranged from 2.37 to 10.96 mg/L compared to the range

captured by the reference measurements of 3.63 to 9.85 mg/L. The average and standard deviation

of the differences between accepted instrument measurements and reference readings (n=33 of

possible n=129) were -0.032 ± 0.402mg/L, with a total range in the differences of -1.458 to 0.482

mg/L. No calculation of a drift rate is included given the short operating interval and high

variability which suggested an immediate problem within the instrument.

.