Previous Page  25 / 59 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 59 Next Page
Page Background

Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 2016-014

ACT VS16-05

25

Individual response slopes and intercepts of instrument measurement versus reference DO

for each of the laboratory trials at a fixed temperature and salinity level are summarized in Table 4.

Minor differences were observed in response slopes across temperature or salinity. The mean of

the slopes decreased from 1.02 to 0.98 from the 0 to 35 salinity trials.

Table 4.

Summary of regression statistics for the Hach HL4 versus reference sample response curves for

each of the nine laboratory trials.

Test ID

R2

y Intercept

Slope

LT15S00

1.000

-0.073

1.040

LT15S10

1.000

-0.112

1.023

LT15S35

1.000

-0.084

0.973

LT04S00

1.000

-0.104

1.047

LT04S10

1.000

-0.016

0.985

LT04S35

nd

nd

nd

LT30S00

0.999

-0.196

0.972

LT30S10

1.000

-0.146

0.986

LT30S35

1.000

-0.086

0.987

Results of the 56 day long-term stability and thermal stress challenge for the Hach HL4

LDO are shown in figure K. The instrument was maintained in a well circulated tank and oxygen

content manipulated by alternately varying water temperature set point between 15 and 25

o

C

several times per week of deployment. The time series of instrument readings at 15 min intervals

is plotted against discrete values for Winkler reference samples (

top panel

) along with the time

series of the difference between instrument and reference measurements (

bottom panel

). The

instrument stopped logging 7 days after deployment. The overall mean of differences between the

initial 18 comparative measurements (out of a potential total of 156) was -0.177 (±0.086) mg/L.

Results for a functional sensor response time assessment of the Hach HL4 are shown in

figure L. The top panel depicts the time series of 15s instrument reads during transfers between

adjacent high (9.6 mg/L) and low (2.0 mg/L) DO water baths, maintained commonly at 15

o

C. The

bottom panel (

lower left

) depicts results fit with a 3 parameter exponential decay function: DO

rel

=

DO

relMin

+ a

e

-bt

and indicated τ calculated from fit. Data for low DO to high DO transitions (

lower

right

) were treated similarly but normalized to steady state value in subsequent high DO tank and

subsequently fit with an analogous 3 parameter exponential rise function: DO

rel

= DO

relMin

+ a(1-

e

-

bt

) with indicated τ being directly calculated from fit. The calculated τ

90

was 27 s during high to

low transitions and 26 s for low to high transitions covering a DO range of approximately 8 mg/L

at a constant 15

o

C.