Background Image
Previous Page  8 / 47 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 47 Next Page
Page Background

Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 2015-009

ACT VS15-02

8

Relationships between the different concentration scales depend on temperature, salinity,

and pressure. At 25°C, salinity 35, and 1 atm, relationships between seawater scale, total scale

and free scale pH (pH

sws

, pH

T

and pH) are given approximately as:

pH minus pH

T

= 0.108 (4)

pH

T

minus pH

sws

= 0.008 (5)

pH

NBS

minus pH

sws

≈ 0.13 (6)

Equation (4) was derived using the K

SO4

characteristics given in DOE (1994). Alternative

descriptions of the HSO

4

-

dissociation equilibrium can produce significant variations in the offset

between total scale and free scale pH. Determinations of K

F

in seawater are sufficiently coherent

that deviations from the relationship given in eqn. (5) are quite small. The relationship between

pH

NBS

and pH

sws

(eqn. 6) is based on the discussion of Culberson (1981). It is important to note

that

f

H

, and therefore eqn. (6), is electrode-dependent. Measurements of

a

H

on the NBS scale are

expressed in terms of mol/kg-H

2

O, while the other scales express concentrations in terms of

mol/kg

(SW)

.

Spectrophotometric measurements of pH in seawater using purified meta-cresol purple

are generally expressed on the total H

+

scale. Using Tris seawater buffers, glass electrodes are

also commonly calibrated on the total scale (pH

T

).

There are significant changes in junction potentials when electrodes are calibrated in

dilute media and then utilized for measurements in high ionic strength media such as seawater. In

such cases there is no direct way to relate pH

NBS

values to pH

T

or pH

SWS

values unless electrodes

are calibrated in both dilute buffers (NIST buffers) and also artificial seawater buffers such as

Tris.

SUMMARY of VERIFICATION PROTOCOLS

The protocols used for this performance verification were developed in conference with

ACT personnel, the participating instrument manufacturers and a technical advisory committee.

The protocols were refined through direct discussions between all parties during two pH Sensor

Performance Verification Protocol Workshops held on 18-20 June, 2012 and 26-28 June, 2013 in

Ann Arbor, MI. All ACT personnel involved in this verification were trained on use of

instruments by manufacturer representatives and on standardized water sampling, storage,

analysis and shipping methods during a training workshop held on 3-6 Dec, 2012 in Kaneohe,

HI. The manufacturer representatives and the ACT Chief Scientist verified that all staff were

trained in both instrument and sample collection protocols.

This performance verification report presents instrument output in derived pH values

reported over time as directly downloaded from the test instruments or captured through

independent dataloggers. A summary of the testing protocols is provided below. A complete

description of the testing protocols is available in the report,

Protocols for the Performance

Verification of In Situ pH Sensors

(ACT PV12-01) and can be downloaded from the ACT

website

( http://www.act-us.info/Download/Evalutations/pH/Protocols/index.html )

.