Previous Page  8 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 2016-016

ACT VS16-07

8

Functional Response Time Test

A response time test was conducted by examining measurements during a rapid exchange

across a large gradient in dissolved oxygen for a fixed temperature (15

o

C) in deionized water,

following the approach described in Bittig et al. 2014. The reservoirs of the thermostat baths were

constantly bubbled with either N

2

gas or air to maintain discrete DO levels. A submersible pump

was added to each bath to ensure uniform flow and oxygen conditions and instruments were

mounted at a fixed position within the baths to minimize variance due to instrument manipulation.

Instruments were programmed to measure every 10s continuously (or their fastest possible rate) for

eight minutes following the exchange. For instruments with the capability, real-time monitoring of

instrument output was monitored to verify a steady state reading had been obtained. Instruments

were moved from the high DO concentration to the low DO concentration and subsequently

reversed to check for response hysteresis. During transitions, care was taken to minimize

carryover by shaking off residual water. The sensor was then carefully inserting into the new

bucket and mixed by hand to ensure no bubble entrapment and full exposure to the new solution.

Reference samples from each reservoir were taken at the beginning and end of the exposure. The

test instrument was equilibrated in the high DO reservoir for at least 30 min prior to the exchange

to ensure temperature equilibration.

Lab-based Stability Test

A laboratory stability test was conducted to examine potential instrument drift in a non-

biofouling environment. These results are contrasted to the stability of measurement accuracy

observed in the long-term field mooring deployments. The test occurred over 56 days, with daily

temperature fluctuations of approximately 10

o

C, achieved by alternating the set point of the

recirculation chiller. Reference samples were collected at minimum and maximum temperatures at

least 3 times per week. The test was conducted in deionized water at saturated air conditions.

Tanks were well circulated and open to the atmosphere. Water in the test tank was exchanged as

needed if there was any indication of biological growth. Instruments stayed continuously

submerged and were not exposed to air during any water exchange. The goal of

comparisons of

accuracy over time between the field and a sensor deployed similarly in the laboratory is intended

to provide insight into drift and reliability intrinsic to the instrument relative to changes that may

result from biofouling.

Moored Field Tests

Field Deployment Sites and Conditions

A four month moored deployment was conducted at Michigan Technological University’s

Great Lakes Research Center dock in Houghton, MI. Instruments were deployed in January and

kept under ice cover until April. Instruments were programmed to sample at a minimum frequency

of once per hour. ACT collected reference samples twice per day for 4 days per week during the

entire deployment. Instruments were moored at approximately 4m depth and surface access

through the ice was maintained by gentle circulation with a propeller to allow deployment of the

Van Dorn sampling bottle. The goal of this test application was to demonstrate instrument

performance (reliability, accuracy, and stability) in winter-time environmental conditions and to

demonstrate the ability to operate continuous observations under ice.