Previous Page  13 / 59 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 59 Next Page
Page Background

Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 2016-013

ACT VS16-04

13

for no less than 30 minutes.

(3) The sample was then rapidly fixed as a normal sample, and on the auto titrator.

(4) A global reagent blank taken as the mean of samples fixed at each test site (0.078 ± 0.020, n=5)

and used to correct all reference values.

RESULTS of LABORATORY TESTING

Instrument accuracy for the HOBO U26 RDO sensor was tested under nine combinations

of temperature and salinity over a range of DO concentrations from 10% to 120% of saturation.

Specific test conditions are summarized in Table 1. Results are plotted as a time series of

instrument readings against the time series of comparative Winkler reference samples (Figures A-

I). The bottom panel of each figure shows the time series of the difference in instrument

measurement versus corresponding reference sample (denoted as Delta’s). Comparisons of tank

duplicates taken at opposite sides of the tank from between 9-18 of the timepoints during each trial

showed a mean difference of 0.017 mg/L, with a range over the nine trials of 0.006 – 0.038 mg/L.

Those values are within the analytical precision of the reference method and indicate conditions

throughout the tank were very homogeneous. However, small changes in measured DO

concentrations did occur during some of the sampling phases indicating the tank was slightly

moderating after sparging was stopped. Those small drifts in DO concentrations were clearly

captured by both instrument and reference sample measurements.

Table 1.

Dissolved oxygen temperature and salinity challenge trial conditions. For each trial pre and post

measurements of tank temperature (

o

C) and salinity (S) were made with an calibrated SBE26+4M CTD,

equilibrated in well mixed tank for 20 min until stable readings obtained.

Trial ID

Mean

Temperature

o

C

S.D.

Temperature

o

C

Mean

Salinity

PSU

S.D.

Salinity

PSU

Levels of

DO tested

mg/L

Figure

for

HOBO

L_T15_S00

15.44

0.03

0.00

0.000

0, 2, 5,9,10,14

A

L_T15_S10

15.47

0.01

8.82

0.003

0, 2, 8, 9, 13

B

L_T15_S35

15.39

0.03

34.20

0.009

0,2,6,8,12

C

L_T04_S00

5.40

0.08

0.00

0.000

0,4, 12, 17

D

L_T04_S10

5.30

0.03

8.98

0.009

0, 5, 12, 16

E

L_T04_S35

5.23

0.07

34.77

0.073

0, 4, 10, 14

F

L_T30_S00

30.22

0.03

0.00

0.000

0, 3, 5, 9

G

L_T30_S10

30.51

0.12

9.28

0.036

0, 3, 7, 10

H

L_T30_S35

30.61

0.07

34.43

0.050

0, 2, 6, 9

I

The mean and standard deviation of the differences between the HOBO U26 RDO and

reference measurements for each trial (n = 36 - 51) are presented in Table 2.

Explanations for the

difference between observed and possible comparative observations for the Lab trials are noted in

the respective figure legends. Mean difference among trials ranged from 0.047 to 0.314 mg/L over

all nine trials. There was a slight decrease in the magnitude of the differences across both

temperature and salinity levels (Table 2).