Previous Page  13 / 34 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 34 Next Page
Page Background

ACT Autonomous Surface Vehicle Workshop Report

Page

13

of

34

standard levels of autonomy and supervision are defined categorically the precise

actions to take to meet this risk tolerance become more clear.

Therefore, in the following sections, after first illustrating several kinds of operational

environments to provide context for future discussion, five levels of autonomy and

three levels of supervision are proposed. In defining these levels, a standard is set that

may be adopted by vessel manufacturers, operators and the public to clarify their

communications and thinking about operation of autonomous marine vessels.

Operational Environment

Operational environments vary greatly in the level of risk presented to unmanned

vehicles. Ports and harbors present a very complex, high risk environment in which an

unmanned system would have to contend with a high density of other vessel traffic,

complex vessel traffic routing schemes, fishing gear, and other navigational hazards.

Polar areas are unlikely to present similar hazards and the unmanned system may not

encounter any other vessels or obstacles at all, but can present other risks, such as ice

and remote operations, that may require very robust systems. At the other end of the

range, unmanned systems may be operated in controlled environments, such as lakes or

reservoirs, where the obstacles are known and can be managed in advance.

Additionally, areas with high currents require different considerations from those

without, particularly when the currents are a large fraction of the vessel’s maximum

speed. Weather and sea state further complicate any environment. Therefore, it is

important to recognize the interaction between environment, level of autonomy, and

level of supervision desired when assessing risk and determining the suitability of an

unmanned system for the desired task. The high level of autonomy necessary for

unsupervised operations in a high risk environment, such as a busy harbor, may not be

achievable. However, a system with basic autonomy may be suitable for such an

environment if a high level of supervision is practical. Conversely, basic autonomy may

be all that is necessary to successfully operate a system with very little supervision in a

controlled environment.

Levels of Vessel Autonomy

Because the levels of vessel autonomy can vary so greatly between vessels,

environment and mission it is useful to define them categorically. Well defined levels of

autonomy help to clarify requirements between manufacturers and their customers.

Moreover, they imply a level of the relative risk of operations and therefore ancillary

systems to put in place to mitigate those risks. Thus five levels of autonomy are defined

and described in detail below with examples for illustration. They are: Remote Piloting

(“manual”), Basic Autonomy (“do as you’re told”), Intermediate Autonomy (“do as your

told and react to what’s known”), Advanced Autonomy (“do as your told, sense and

react to what’s not known”) and Planning (“think”).

In addition, when defining the five levels of autonomy it becomes useful to separate the

levels of autonomy into three categories within each level. The three categories are