Previous Page  13 / 59 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 59 Next Page
Page Background

Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 2016-014

ACT VS16-05

13

RESULTS of LABORATORY TESTING

Instrument accuracy for the Hach HL4 LDO sensor was tested under nine combinations of

temperature and salinity over a range of DO concentrations from 10% to 120% of saturation.

Specific test conditions are summarized in Table 1. Results are plotted as a time series of

instrument readings against the time series of comparative Winkler reference samples (Figures A-

I). The bottom panel of each figure shows the time series of the difference in instrument

measurement versus corresponding reference sample (denoted as Delta’s). Comparisons of tank

duplicates taken at opposite sides of the tank from between 9-18 of the timepoints during each trial

showed a mean difference of 0.017 mg/L, with a range over the nine trials of 0.006 – 0.038 mg/L.

Those values are within the analytical precision of the reference method and indicate conditions

throughout the tank were very homogeneous. However, small changes in measured DO

concentrations did occur during some of the sampling phases indicating the tank was slightly

moderating after sparging was stopped. Those small drifts in DO concentrations were clearly

captured by both instrument and reference sample measurements.

Table 1.

Dissolved oxygen temperature and salinity challenge trial conditions. For each trial pre and post

measurements of tank temperature (

o

C) and salinity (S) were made with a calibrated SBE26+4M CTD,

equilibrated in well mixed tank for 20 min until stable readings obtained.

Trial ID

Mean

Temperature

o

C

S.D.

Temperature

o

C

Mean

Salinity

PSU

S.D.

Salinity

PSU

Levels of

DO tested

mg/L

Figure

for

HL4

L_T15_S00

15.44

0.03

0.00

0.000

0, 2, 5,9,10,14

A

L_T15_S10

15.47

0.01

8.82

0.003

0, 2, 8, 9, 13

B

L_T15_S35

15.39

0.03

34.20

0.009

0,2,6,8,12

C

L_T04_S00

5.40

0.08

0.00

0.000

0,4, 12, 17

D

L_T04_S10

5.30

0.03

8.98

0.009

0, 5, 12, 16

E

L_T04_S35

5.23

0.07

34.77

0.073

0, 4, 10, 14

F

L_T30_S00

30.22

0.03

0.00

0.000

0, 3, 5, 9

G

L_T30_S10

30.51

0.12

9.28

0.036

0, 3, 7, 10

H

L_T30_S35

30.61

0.07

34.43

0.050

0, 2, 6, 9

I

The mean and standard deviation of the differences between the Hach HL4 and reference

measurements for each trial (n = 19 – 51 comparative observations) are presented in Table 2.

Explanations for the difference between observed and possible comparative observations for the

Lab trials are noted in the respective figure legends. The mean of the differences among trials

ranged from -0.315 to 0.304 mg/L over eight of the nine trials. N

o data was recorded during one of

the trials due to an apparent internal power failure.

There was an apparent temperature effect on

instrument response with mean offsets varying from 0.084, 0.001, and -0.217 mg/L across

temperature trials of 5, 15, and 30

o

C, respectively. Similarly there was an apparent salinity effect

on instrument response with the mean offsets varying from 0.058, -0.103, and -0.115 mg/L across

salinity trials of 0, 10, and 35, respectively.