Background Image
Previous Page  10 / 57 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 57 Next Page
Page Background

Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 2015-010

ACT VS15-03

conditions. Each test was scheduled to last 1 week, except when delays were needed to

accommodate work schedules. For each new T-S test condition, the test tank was flushed and

filled with new source water while keeping all test instruments submerged and recording

continuously. Each new batch of source water was filtered through a 1 µm cartridge prior to use

in the tests.

Laboratory Test Reference Sampling -

During the stable temperature and salinity period,

reference samples were collected and analyzed at 4 timepoints each day. In addition, on one day

during the stable cycle, a burst sampling of five independent measurements were collected 5

minutes apart at one of the timepoints to evaluate the repeatability and uncertainty of the

reference measurement with respect to the variability observed within the test tank. Reference

samples were drawn directly into the spectrophotometer cell from a supply tube within the test

tank. After the cell was blanked and prior to the dye addition and spectrophotometric readings,

the temperature of the cell was measured and adjusted to within 0.1 degree or less of the tank

temperature. 10 readings of the reacted dye were recorded over 1-2 minutes for each sampling

timepoint, and a mean and standard deviation of each reference measurement was calculated.

The final temperature of the sample in the cell was recorded immediately after reading to define

any deviation from the specified reading temperature. The temperature of the sample stream was

monitored continuously and the salinity of the sample stream was measured on duplicate sub-

samples with a Guideline Portasal. Once during the stable phase of a given T-S test condition a

more detailed burst sampling was conducted, where 6-8 samples were collected over the course

of an hour to assess the fine-scale variability (temporal and spatial) of test tank conditions.

During the pH cycling phase of the test, 2 reference sampling timepoints were completed during

each endpoint (approximately an hour after acid/base addition) of the increase or decrease. Each

phase (increase or decrease) occurred over roughly 2 hour intervals.

Lastly, duplicate water samples were collected at the beginning and end of the stable test

condition period (day 1 and day 5) to characterize all of the CO

2

parameters. Water samples

were taken for pCO

2

, Dissolved Inorganic Carbon and Total Alkalinity measurements and

preserved and stored in accordance with standard oceanic protocols (Dickson et al., 2007). These

water samples were shipped to Oregon State University (Burke Hales, OSU) and Scripps

Institute of Oceanography (Andrew Dickson, SIO) for analysis. In addition, preserved water

samples were shipped to SIO (Andrew Dickson) and University of South Florida (Robert Byrne,

USF) for measurements of pH, thereby providing further indication of the uncertainty of ACT’s

reference sample measurements. However, because these samples were not handled identically

to the reference samples analyzed real-time and directly from the test tank, they will not be used

in any direct assessment against the test instruments without review from the TAC and consent

from the manufacturer. Nutrients were also measured on these samples in Atkinson's lab.

Moored Field Tests

Moored field tests were conducted at four ACT Partner Institution sites covering

freshwater, estuarine, and open-ocean conditions. The test sites include Moss Landing Marine

Laboratories (MLML), CA; Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology (HIMB), HI; Chesapeake

Biological Laboratory (CBL), MD; and Lake Michigan, MI. The field tests occurred in

sequence, starting with Moss Landing on August 22, 2013. The duration of the moored

deployment tests were 4 weeks, except at the Hawaii test site where instruments were deployed

10