Background Image
Previous Page  10 / 59 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 59 Next Page
Page Background

Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 2015-008

ACT VS15-01

10

monitored continuously and the salinity of the sample stream was measured on duplicate sub-

samples with a Guideline Portasal. Once during the stable phase of a given T-S test condition a

more detailed burst sampling was conducted, where 6-8 samples were collected over the course

of an hour to assess the fine-scale variability (temporal and spatial) of test tank conditions.

During the pH cycling phase of the test, 2 reference sampling timepoints were completed during

each endpoint (approximately an hour after acid/base addition) of the increase or decrease. Each

phase (increase or decrease) occurred over roughly 2 hour intervals.

Lastly, duplicate water samples were collected at the beginning and end of the stable test

condition period (day 1 and day 5) to characterize all of the CO

2

parameters. Water samples

were taken for pCO

2

, Dissolved Inorganic Carbon and Total Alkalinity measurements and

preserved and stored in accordance with standard oceanic protocols (Dickson et al., 2007). These

water samples were shipped to Oregon State University (Burke Hales, OSU) and Scripps

Institute of Oceanography (Andrew Dickson, SIO) for analysis. In addition, preserved water

samples were shipped to SIO (Andrew Dickson) and University of South Florida (Robert Byrne,

USF) for measurements of pH, thereby providing further indication of the uncertainty of ACT’s

reference sample measurements. However, because these samples were not handled identically

to the reference samples analyzed real-time and directly from the test tank, they will not be used

in any direct assessment against the test instruments without review from the TAC and consent

from the manufacturer. Nutrients were also measured on these samples in Atkinson's lab.

Moored Field Tests

Moored field tests were conducted at four ACT Partner Institution sites covering

freshwater, estuarine, and open-ocean conditions. The test sites include Moss Landing Marine

Laboratories (MLML), CA; Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology (HIMB), HI; Chesapeake

Biological Laboratory (CBL), MD; and Lake Michigan, MI. The field tests occurred in

sequence, starting with Moss Landing on August 22, 2013. The duration of the moored

deployment tests were 4 weeks, except at the Hawaii test site where instruments were deployed

for a period of 12 weeks. Instruments were removed from the water only after the test period

was complete.

Instrument Setup

– Prior to deployment, all instruments were set up at the field site by a trained

ACT staff member following established protocols that had been developed in collaboration with

the manufacturers at the training session that occurred in December, 2012 (at the beginning of

the ACT laboratory test). Manufacturers that did not conduct an in-person training session sent

written protocols and video demonstration of desired handling procedures. As appropriate, and

where requested by the manufacturer, submitted test instruments were initially calibrated by

ACT staff using a common batch of commercial, non-dyed, NIST traceable buffers at a pH of

7.02 and 10.06. (Each sensor was calibrated with buffer from its own bottle, but they were all

from the same LOT and shipment). All calibrations occurred in a constant temperature bath at

20.0

o

C (except at HI which was done at 25°C). Any deviation from this temperature was noted

and used to adjust the stated pH values of the buffers as defined on the bottles.

After calibration and prior to deployment (again where appropriate for each instrument)

instruments were exposed to additional certified reference solutions. At Moss Landing, CBL and

Hawaii, instruments were exposed to batches of Seawater CRMs produced by the CO2-QC

facility at Scripps Institution of Oceanography. (CRMs were batched into a single container