Previous Page  56 / 59 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 56 / 59 Next Page
Page Background

Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 2016-011

ACT VS16-02

56

The field tests at HIMB during September 28, 2015 – October 1, 2015.

The audits were conducted in accordance with the procedures described in EPA's

Guidance

on Technical Audits and Related Assessments for Environmental Data Operations (EPA QA/G-7)

.

The audits included a review of staff, test procedures (sample collection, sample analysis, data

processing, etc.), facilities, and documentation.

The TSA’s’ findings for the two field tests were positive and indicated that these components

of the DO sensor verification were being implemented in a manner consistent with the Test Protocols

and SOPs. Minor deviations, such as schedule changes, were documented in laboratory records.

None of the deviations in the Test Protocols had any effect on data quality for the verification and

no corrective action was required. All phases of the implementation of the test reviewed during the

TSA were acceptable and performed in a manner consistent with ACT data quality goals. The overall

quality assurance objectives of the test were met.

ACT personnel are well-qualified to implement the verification, and demonstrated expertise

in pertinent procedures. Communication and coordination among all personnel was frequent and

effective. ACT’s internal record keeping and document control is well organized. The ACT staff

understands the need for QC, as shown in the conscientious development and implementation of a

variety of QC procedures.

All samples and instrument measurements were collected, analyzed and cataloged as

described in the Test Protocols and SOPs. Examination of maintenance and calibration logs provided

evidence of recent and suitable calibration of sampling and analytical equipment.

Data Assessments

Data review is conducted to ensure that only sound data that are of known and documented

quality and meet ACT technology verification quality objectives are used in making decisions about

technology performance. ACT’s data review processes are based in part on two EPA guidance

documents:

Guidance on Environmental Data Verification and Data Validation

(QA/G-8) [EPA,

2002] and

Guidance on Technical Audits and Related Assessments for Environmental Data

Operations

(QA/G-7) [EPA, 2000].

At the outset of the assessment phase, the data were verified and validated to evaluate

whether the data have been generated according to the Test Protocols, satisfy acceptance criteria,

and are appropriate and consistent with their intended use of evaluating the performance of the test

sensors. Data verification evaluates the completeness, correctness, and consistency of the data sets

against the requirements specified in the Test Protocols, measurement quality objectives (MQOs) in

the ACT Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP), and any other analytical process requirements

contained in SOPs. The ACT QA Manager reviewed the reference sample data sets from all field

sites and verified that the sampling and analysis protocols specified in the Test Protocols were

followed, and that the ACT measurement and analytical systems performed in accordance with

approved methods, based on:

The raw data records were complete, understandable, well-labeled, and traceable;

All data identified in the Test Protocols were collected;

QC criteria were achieved; and

Data calculations were accurate.